News

27 July 2026

𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹

In HKSAR v. Chiu Chung Yuen [2025] HKCFI 6172; HCCC 2/2024, Andrew Raffell and Phoebe Lau acted for the Defendant (“D”), who was charged with one count of Murder.

In trial, D took the witness box and gave the following evidence: - 

Being terrified by the chain of events, D came up with 6 versions of the events to the authority and 3 VRIs were conducted. However, it is worth noting that the version of events given by D after caution corroborates with what D said in his 3rd VRI and his evidence given in trial.

The government pathologist, a Prosecution witness, in the Autopsy Report, her witness statements and in her evidence given in trial under cross-examination, agreed with D’s version of events, that the wound of the Deceased fit in what D said in his 3rd VRI and D’s evidence given in trial.

After an 8-day trial, the jury returned unanimous verdicts of acquittal of Murder and guilty of Manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act. D was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 10 years (after deducting a 1/3 discount due to his guilty plea to manslaughter at the earliest opportunity).

In this case, the importance of a proper investigation and expert evidence in a criminal trial and how the outcome of a criminal case could have turned out differently with a proper investigation are illustrated.

Members Profile: Andrew J. Raffell and Phoebe H.K. Lau